A few weeks ago, I posted a critique of the alternate inflation measure devised by John Williams for his popular website ShadowStats.com. Several responders asked if I could also comment on Williams’ alternate unemployment rate.
Here, reproduced with permission
is the latest unemployment chart from ShadowStats. Like William’s
inflation rate, his unemployment numbers run far higher than the
official data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This post
addresses two questions: First, what is the intended purpose of the
ShadowStats alternate unemployment indicator? Second, given what it
tries to do, is it calculated in a reasonable way?
In search of the employment gap
standard unemployment rate from the BLS, known as U-3, focuses on a
very narrow segment of the labor market. It tells us how many people are
not working but who have actively looked for work in the past four
weeks, expressed as a percentage of the civilian labor force. (The
civilian labor force includes all people 16 years and older who are not
in prison or the armed services.)The ratio of active job seekers to the
labor force is highly sensitive to ups and downs in the business cycle.
For that reason, monetary and fiscal policymakers watch it closely in
deciding whether the economy needs stimulus or restraint. It is not
perfect, but if what we want is a short-term business cycle indicator,
it is probably good enough.
Williams, however, is looking for
something different. His alternate unemployment rate should be
understood as a broad measure of the employment gap—the difference between the amount of work that people would like to do and the amount they actually do. >>>Read more
Post a Comment