Monday, April 29, 2013
Is the Chained CPI the Right Fix for Social Security?
One of the most controversial elements of President Obama’s 2014 budget
is the proposal to reduce future cost-of-living adjustments to Social
Security benefits by changing the inflation index. The Social Security
Administration now bases inflation adjustments to on the consumer price
index for urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W), a close
cousin of the more widely publicized CPI for all urban consumers
(CPI-U). The administration proposal would instead use a relatively new
index called the chained CPI, or C-CPI-U, which, in the past, has
increased slightly less rapidly. Predictably, deficit hawks love the
idea, while seniors and those who defend their interests hate it.
Suppose, though, that we set ideology and interest group politics aside
to look at the underlying economics of the issue. On those terms, is the
switch to the chained CPI the right fix for Social Security? >>>Read more
Friday, April 26, 2013
US GDP Growth Accelerates from a Crawl to a Walk in Q1
US GDP growth accelerated from a crawl to a walk in the first quarter of 2013, according to the advance estimate
issued today by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The reported annual
growth rate of 2.5 percent was just a bit faster than the average rate
during the recovery, and much stronger than the 0.4 percent reported for
Q4 2012. Compared with yesterday’s news that the British economy had
barely escaped a triple-dip recession and that unemployment hit a record
high in Spain, the latest numbers position the United States as one of
the healthiest of the advanced economies. Behind the headline growth
rate, however, some of the details were less encouraging.
Personal consumption expenditure was the most important component of the acceleration. Consumption contributed 2.24 percentage points to the Q1 growth rate, compared to just 1.28 percentage points in Q4. Nearly all of that came from the service sector. Housing services and utilities, recreation, and financial services all showed strong gains. Growth in consumption of goods slowed slightly. >>>Read more
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts and commentary on the latest GDP data
Personal consumption expenditure was the most important component of the acceleration. Consumption contributed 2.24 percentage points to the Q1 growth rate, compared to just 1.28 percentage points in Q4. Nearly all of that came from the service sector. Housing services and utilities, recreation, and financial services all showed strong gains. Growth in consumption of goods slowed slightly. >>>Read more
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts and commentary on the latest GDP data
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
US CPI Lower in March on Falling Gasoline Prices
The US Consumer Price Index fell in March at an annual rate of -2.14 percent. The decrease reversed a sharp upward spike in February, when the annualized inflation rate rose to over 8 percent. Almost all of the volatility in recent months has been due to ups and downs in energy prices, especially gasoline. Energy prices have a weight of over 9 percent in the CPI. Energy prices rose by 5.4 percent in February, and decreased by 2.6 percent in March.
Energy prices are strongly influenced by events in the global economy. For that reason, policymakers at the Fed and elsewhere pay more attention to measures of underlying inflation. One such measure is the core CPI, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The core CPI, which strips out food and energy prices, rose at an annual rate of 1.33 percent in March.
Another measure of underlying inflation is the 16-percent trimmed mean CPI published by the Cleveland Fed. That index drops the 8 percent of prices that increase most in a given month, along with the 8 percent that increase least or decrease most. The 16-percent trimmed mean index rose at an annual rate of just 0.72 percent in March. The following chart shows all three measures.
The Fed considers that inflation of 2 percent is consistent with its mandate to maintain price stability. In March, both measures of underlying inflation were well below the 2 percent target. Furthermore, estimates of expected inflation also remain well below 2 percent over both 5- and 10-year time horizons. In view of those data, most observers consider it unlikely that the Fed will tighten monetary policy any time soon.
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts of the most recent inflation data.
Energy prices are strongly influenced by events in the global economy. For that reason, policymakers at the Fed and elsewhere pay more attention to measures of underlying inflation. One such measure is the core CPI, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The core CPI, which strips out food and energy prices, rose at an annual rate of 1.33 percent in March.
Another measure of underlying inflation is the 16-percent trimmed mean CPI published by the Cleveland Fed. That index drops the 8 percent of prices that increase most in a given month, along with the 8 percent that increase least or decrease most. The 16-percent trimmed mean index rose at an annual rate of just 0.72 percent in March. The following chart shows all three measures.
The Fed considers that inflation of 2 percent is consistent with its mandate to maintain price stability. In March, both measures of underlying inflation were well below the 2 percent target. Furthermore, estimates of expected inflation also remain well below 2 percent over both 5- and 10-year time horizons. In view of those data, most observers consider it unlikely that the Fed will tighten monetary policy any time soon.
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts of the most recent inflation data.
Monday, April 15, 2013
Slovenia isn't Cyprus, but that doesn't Mean it's Not in Trouble
Leo Tolstoy wrote that all happy families are alike, but each unhappy
family is unhappy in its own way. Much the same is true of economies.
Maybe that was what EU Commission President Jose Barosso had in mind
when he said recently that, “it is a completely different situation in
Cyprus and in Slovenia.” Different, but in many ways no less dangerous.
For those struggling to keep up with the ever-evolving euro crisis, here
are some of the key ways in which the impending crisis in Slovenia
differs from—and resembles—the others.
The macroeconomic context
As in many other countries, the crisis in Slovenia, which now centers on the banking system, has developed against a background of broader macroeconomic problems. Not long ago, Slovenia’s economy was doing well. The country was one of the ten that entered the EU in 2004. Like others in its cohort, it initially enjoyed rapid economic growth. The following chart, which compares Slovenia’s economic growth since 2000 with selected other countries, shows that before the global financial crisis, Slovenia looked a lot like Poland, one of the EU’s biggest success stories. Since the crisis, it has looked more like Portugal.
What accounts for the shift from success story to problem case? Although many factors were at play, two were especially significant. >>>Read more
The macroeconomic context
As in many other countries, the crisis in Slovenia, which now centers on the banking system, has developed against a background of broader macroeconomic problems. Not long ago, Slovenia’s economy was doing well. The country was one of the ten that entered the EU in 2004. Like others in its cohort, it initially enjoyed rapid economic growth. The following chart, which compares Slovenia’s economic growth since 2000 with selected other countries, shows that before the global financial crisis, Slovenia looked a lot like Poland, one of the EU’s biggest success stories. Since the crisis, it has looked more like Portugal.
What accounts for the shift from success story to problem case? Although many factors were at play, two were especially significant. >>>Read more
Thursday, April 11, 2013
A Disappointing, Procyclical, and Highly Politicized Budget
The White House has officially unveiled its budget for fiscal year
2014. I hope to have a chance to look at some of the numbers and
programs in depth over the coming weeks, but the overview
alone confirms what many leaks have suggested, namely, that this is a
disappointing, highly politicized document. Here are some first
impressions:
A commitment to continued procyclical austerity
The first thing the proposal makes clear is that the White House has joined Congressional Republicans in a bi-partisan commitment to austerity. It promises $1.8 trillion of additional fiscal consolidation over 10 years, in addition to $2.5 trillion already achieved, about the same as the GOP is looking for. The only difference is a fig leaf’s worth of proposed new revenue in the White House version, $1 for each $2 of spending cuts.
Under the proposal, federal tax receipts would reach 20 percent of GDP by 2020, about same as would have been allowed by such conservative initiatives as a balanced budget amendment proposed last year by Sen. Orin Hatch. True, some Republicans have held out for a still lower target, but even capping tax receipts at 20 percent of GDP would, in view of the demographic realities of an aging population, mean a much smaller government than Americans have become accustomed to during most of the post-World War II period. (See here for some relevant charts.)
The path of fiscal policy under the budget proposed by the White House continues the procyclical pattern that has prevailed for most of the past decade. A countercyclical policy would move the structural balance (that is, the surplus or deficit adjusted to take account the state of the business cycle) toward deficit when the economy is operating below its potential and toward surplus only after it approaches or reaches full employment. Instead, the pattern since 2010, and continued under the budget plan, is exactly the opposite.>>>Read more
A commitment to continued procyclical austerity
The first thing the proposal makes clear is that the White House has joined Congressional Republicans in a bi-partisan commitment to austerity. It promises $1.8 trillion of additional fiscal consolidation over 10 years, in addition to $2.5 trillion already achieved, about the same as the GOP is looking for. The only difference is a fig leaf’s worth of proposed new revenue in the White House version, $1 for each $2 of spending cuts.
Under the proposal, federal tax receipts would reach 20 percent of GDP by 2020, about same as would have been allowed by such conservative initiatives as a balanced budget amendment proposed last year by Sen. Orin Hatch. True, some Republicans have held out for a still lower target, but even capping tax receipts at 20 percent of GDP would, in view of the demographic realities of an aging population, mean a much smaller government than Americans have become accustomed to during most of the post-World War II period. (See here for some relevant charts.)
The path of fiscal policy under the budget proposed by the White House continues the procyclical pattern that has prevailed for most of the past decade. A countercyclical policy would move the structural balance (that is, the surplus or deficit adjusted to take account the state of the business cycle) toward deficit when the economy is operating below its potential and toward surplus only after it approaches or reaches full employment. Instead, the pattern since 2010, and continued under the budget plan, is exactly the opposite.>>>Read more
Friday, April 5, 2013
US Payroll Job Growth Slows; Unemployment Rate Drops as Labor Force Shrinks
The U.S. economy created a disappointing 88,000 payroll jobs in March, according to today’s report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
That was down sharply from the 268,000 gain in February. The
unemployment rate fell to 7.6 percent, a new low for the recovery, but
even that was largely due to a drop in labor force participation.
The bulk of the 88,000 new jobs were created in the private service sector. Professional and business services provided 51,000 jobs, followed by 44,000 in educational and health services. Goods producing industries contributed just 16,000 jobs, mostly in construction. Manufacturing employment fell slightly. Government employment continued its long downward trajectory, led by a loss of 14,000 federal jobs. State government employment gained slightly and local government jobs barely changed. >>>Read more
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts of the latest US employment situation
The bulk of the 88,000 new jobs were created in the private service sector. Professional and business services provided 51,000 jobs, followed by 44,000 in educational and health services. Goods producing industries contributed just 16,000 jobs, mostly in construction. Manufacturing employment fell slightly. Government employment continued its long downward trajectory, led by a loss of 14,000 federal jobs. State government employment gained slightly and local government jobs barely changed. >>>Read more
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts of the latest US employment situation
Thursday, April 4, 2013
Why Hasn't the US become another Greece?
How many times have we heard the warning that if the government in
Washington doesn’t change its ways, the United States could become
another Greece? Three years ago, when the crisis in Greece was just
getting underway, I wrote a post making some comparisons between Greek and U.S. fiscal performance, along with a separate slideshow
that presented a supporting set of charts. One key chart showed the two
countries’ fiscal balances moving in an ominously parallel pattern that
suggested that the United States might be about to follow Greece down
the fiscal drain.
Last week, a reader who had run across the old slideshow scolded me for having been an alarmist. While the crisis in Greece has morphed from a crisis into a disaster, he pointed out, the U.S. economy has gradually recovered and its fiscal balance has improved markedly. Why? What were the key factors that made the difference? >>>Read More
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow version of this post complete with additional charts.
Last week, a reader who had run across the old slideshow scolded me for having been an alarmist. While the crisis in Greece has morphed from a crisis into a disaster, he pointed out, the U.S. economy has gradually recovered and its fiscal balance has improved markedly. Why? What were the key factors that made the difference? >>>Read More
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow version of this post complete with additional charts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)