The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported today that US GDP grew at a
3.5 percent annual rate in
the third quarter of 2014. Combined with the
strong 4.6 percent showing in Q2, the six-month average of 4.05 percent
is the best half-year performance of the recovery. Even including the
2.1 percent annual rate of decrease for Q1, growth over the past full
year was better than the average since the recession bottomed out in
mid-2009.
Net
exports were one of the biggest contributors to growth in the quarter. Net exports, which had been a negative
factor in the otherwise strong second quarter, accounted for 1.32
percentage points of growth—more than a third of overall GDP growth for
Q3. Export performance remained strong, as it has through most of the
recovery, but the big turnaround was in imports. Imports have a negative
sign in the national accounts, so the -1.77 percentage points for Q2
reflected an increase in imports for that quarter, while the +.29
percentage points for Q3 indicates a decrease in imports.
Another
source of growth in Q3 was a .83 percentage point contribution by the
government sector. Most of that was an unusual .69 percentage point
growth of national defense consumption expenditure. Defense expenditures
tend not to be spread evenly from quarter to quarter. They can account
for abrupt jumps in the contribution of the federal government to GDP
growth, as they also did in Q4 of 2012 (see the following chart). A
recovering state and local government sector again made a positive
contribution to GDP growth in Q3, as it has for six of the past seven
quarters.>>>Read more
Follow this link to view or download a short slideshow with additional charts based on the latest US GDP release
Pages
▼
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Monday, October 20, 2014
Why Should Europe (or Anyone) Fear Deflation?
Europe is fearful as it teeters on the brink of deflation. As the
chart shows, September consumer prices in the eurozone were just 0.3
percent higher than in the same month a year earlier. That is far below
the 2 percent inflation target set by the European Central Bank (ECB).
Five countries were already experiencing deflation, and inflation was at
zero in three others.
Still,
despite all the gloomy deflation headlines, the most common question I
get about deflation is, “So what?” If inflation is bad, why isn’t
deflation good? Why should we do anything but celebrate if the prices
of goods and services fall steadily year after year, and the value of
our money rises accordingly? In this post, the first of two parts, I
will try to explain just why a majority of economists think deflation is
bad. In the second part, I will look at the views of a minority who
think that deflation is actually a good thing, at least sometimes. >>>Read more
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
The Economic Future of Eastern Ukraine ("Novorossiya")
Last May, I posted an item
on the economic situation in the rebellious regions of Eastern Ukraine,
or
“Novorossiya” (New Russia), to use the term increasingly favored by separatists and their Russian sponsors. Novorossiya was the name of a province of Tsarist Russia that occupied much of the southern part of present-day Ukraine, stretching all the way to Odessa. At present, the separatist “Federal State of Novorossiya,” consisting of parts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, lays claim to only a small slice of historical Novorossiya. As the map shows, expansion of the separatist-held territory toward the south-west would provide Russia with an overland route to Crimea.
In
that earlier post, I outlined three possible outcomes of the conflict
in Ukrainian Donbas, the heavily industrialized area around the cities
of Donetsk and Luhansk that is the only part of historical Novorossiya
that the separatists control as of early October. One was that Kiev
would re-establish full control over the region with minimal concessions
to local autonomy. The second was full Russian annexation, as of
Crimea. The third was the emergence of yet another zone of frozen
conflict like those of Transdniestria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and
Nagorno-Karabakh.
Although the fighting has not yet entirely stopped, the conflict is rapidly congealing, making the third variant the most likely. It is time for an update, giving closer attention to that outcome. What would be the economic implications of a frozen conflict for the region itself, for the rest of Ukraine, and for Russia? >>>Read more
“Novorossiya” (New Russia), to use the term increasingly favored by separatists and their Russian sponsors. Novorossiya was the name of a province of Tsarist Russia that occupied much of the southern part of present-day Ukraine, stretching all the way to Odessa. At present, the separatist “Federal State of Novorossiya,” consisting of parts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, lays claim to only a small slice of historical Novorossiya. As the map shows, expansion of the separatist-held territory toward the south-west would provide Russia with an overland route to Crimea.
Although the fighting has not yet entirely stopped, the conflict is rapidly congealing, making the third variant the most likely. It is time for an update, giving closer attention to that outcome. What would be the economic implications of a frozen conflict for the region itself, for the rest of Ukraine, and for Russia? >>>Read more
Sunday, October 5, 2014
US Unemployment Rate Falls to 5.9 Percent on Strong Job Gains
The US unemployment rate fell to 5.9 percent in September, dropping
below 6 percent for the first
time in more than six years. The decrease was powered, in part, by strong growth of payroll jobs. Payroll jobs increased by 248,000 in September, well above the average for the year to date. In the same report, the BLS revised the weak August job gain upward from 142,000 to 180,000, and the July gain from 212,000 to 243,000.
In addition to the standard unemployment rate, the BLS also publishes a broader measure of labor market distress known as U-6. That measure takes into account discouraged workers, others who are marginally attached to the labor force, and people who are working part time but would prefer full-time work. U-6 decreased to 11.8 percent in September, also a six-year low. The unemployment rates are based on a survey of households that differs in several respects from the survey of employers from which payroll job numbers are drawn. According to the household survey, total employed workers increased by 232,000 in September while the number of unemployed decreased by 329,000. The civilian labor force decreased by 97,000, and the employment population ratio was unchanged. >>>Read more
Follow this link to view or download a brief slideshow with charts of the latest employment data
time in more than six years. The decrease was powered, in part, by strong growth of payroll jobs. Payroll jobs increased by 248,000 in September, well above the average for the year to date. In the same report, the BLS revised the weak August job gain upward from 142,000 to 180,000, and the July gain from 212,000 to 243,000.
In addition to the standard unemployment rate, the BLS also publishes a broader measure of labor market distress known as U-6. That measure takes into account discouraged workers, others who are marginally attached to the labor force, and people who are working part time but would prefer full-time work. U-6 decreased to 11.8 percent in September, also a six-year low. The unemployment rates are based on a survey of households that differs in several respects from the survey of employers from which payroll job numbers are drawn. According to the household survey, total employed workers increased by 232,000 in September while the number of unemployed decreased by 329,000. The civilian labor force decreased by 97,000, and the employment population ratio was unchanged. >>>Read more
Follow this link to view or download a brief slideshow with charts of the latest employment data