The third estimate of Q3 2012 US GDP came out on December 20, just as
the holiday season was in full swing and as the limited public appetite
for economic news was focused on the fiscal cliff. The report deserved
more notice than it got. The Bureau of Economic Analysis
revised its estimate of real GDP growth upward to a respectable 3.1
percent from the 2.7 percent of the second estimate, which came out in
November. The latest estimate looked even better set against the anemic
2.0 percent reported in October’s advance estimate. The latest report
also revised the estimate for nominal GDP growth upward to 5.9 percent,
the fastest in almost four years. >>>Read more
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts and analysis of all the latest GDP and NGDP data
Pages
▼
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Classroom Debate Topic: Should We Keep the Charitable Deduction or Scrap It?
Here's a great topic for a debate that will fit in either your micro class (altruism, poverty, preferences) or your macro class (tax reform, fiscal cliff): What should we do about the charitable deduction? Keep it or scrap it?
Yale University's Robert J. Shiller has just weighed in with a New York Times op-ed titled "Please Don't Mess with the Charitable Deduction." He defends the deduction as an essential part of the great American tradition of giving.
Earlier this year I took the opposite position in a pair of posts. (Part 1 and Part 2). I argued that the popularity of the charitable deduction rests on a set of false premises. In reality, the deduction is best viewed not as a tax expenditure, and that not more than a third of the giving that qualifies for the deduction goes to truly charitable purposes. Furthermore, warnings that the nonprofit sector would face collapse without the charitable deduction are greatly exaggerated, if not altogether baseless.
What do your students think? Using these opposing pieces as a starting point, put them to work doing their own research and then let them try out their debating skills.
Yale University's Robert J. Shiller has just weighed in with a New York Times op-ed titled "Please Don't Mess with the Charitable Deduction." He defends the deduction as an essential part of the great American tradition of giving.
Earlier this year I took the opposite position in a pair of posts. (Part 1 and Part 2). I argued that the popularity of the charitable deduction rests on a set of false premises. In reality, the deduction is best viewed not as a tax expenditure, and that not more than a third of the giving that qualifies for the deduction goes to truly charitable purposes. Furthermore, warnings that the nonprofit sector would face collapse without the charitable deduction are greatly exaggerated, if not altogether baseless.
What do your students think? Using these opposing pieces as a starting point, put them to work doing their own research and then let them try out their debating skills.
Saturday, December 15, 2012
US CPI Drops Sharply in November; Inflation Expectations Remain Well Anchored
U.S. Consumer price inflation, which has been unusually volatile over
the past year, turned sharply negative in November. According to data
released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
the all-items CPI fell at an annual rate of 3.7 percent during the
month of November. That was the most rapid rate of decrease since the
worst months of recession in late 2008.
Much of the recent volatility in the CPI has come from the energy sector, particularly gasoline. Consumer inflation spiked at the end of the summer when gasoline prices rose 8.6 percent in August and 6.7 percent in September. Gas prices then fell by 0.5 percent in October and by 6.9 percent in November. >>>Read More
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts of the latest CPI data
Much of the recent volatility in the CPI has come from the energy sector, particularly gasoline. Consumer inflation spiked at the end of the summer when gasoline prices rose 8.6 percent in August and 6.7 percent in September. Gas prices then fell by 0.5 percent in October and by 6.9 percent in November. >>>Read More
Follow this link to view or download a classroom-ready slideshow with charts of the latest CPI data
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Michael Levi talks to James Stafford about Falling Oil Prices, the Shale Boom, and Carbon Pricing
In this exclusive interview, Oilprice.com publisher James Stafford talks with energy security expert Michael Levi,
the David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for Energy and the Environment
and Director of the Program on Energy Security and Climate Change at the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), discusses. The interview was originally posted on Oilprice.com and is reproduced here with permission.
There’s been plenty of talk about potentially radical US foreign policy changes as a result of the shale boom. While one shouldn’t expect any dramatic US foreign policy move away from the Middle East, factors are influencing a greater focus on Asia. Only one thing is certain in this transforming world: The shale boom is real and the implications are many and difficult to predict.
In an exclusive interview with Oilprice.com publisher James Stafford, energy security expert Michael Levi, the David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for Energy and the Environment and Director of the Program on Energy Security and Climate Change at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), discusses:
• Why oil price stability is still all about the Middle East
• Why the oil and gas industry is heading towards transformation
• Why oil prices could drop substantially
• Why the US shale boom is real
• Why the shale oil boom won’t lead to major US foreign policy changes
• Why Keystone XL is pretty much non-essential
• Why we won’t see any radical change in renewables in the next five years
• The carbon pricing remains the best way to achieve meaningful results on climate change
There’s been plenty of talk about potentially radical US foreign policy changes as a result of the shale boom. While one shouldn’t expect any dramatic US foreign policy move away from the Middle East, factors are influencing a greater focus on Asia. Only one thing is certain in this transforming world: The shale boom is real and the implications are many and difficult to predict.
In an exclusive interview with Oilprice.com publisher James Stafford, energy security expert Michael Levi, the David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for Energy and the Environment and Director of the Program on Energy Security and Climate Change at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), discusses:
• Why oil price stability is still all about the Middle East
• Why the oil and gas industry is heading towards transformation
• Why oil prices could drop substantially
• Why the US shale boom is real
• Why the shale oil boom won’t lead to major US foreign policy changes
• Why Keystone XL is pretty much non-essential
• Why we won’t see any radical change in renewables in the next five years
• The carbon pricing remains the best way to achieve meaningful results on climate change
Monday, December 10, 2012
Green Illusions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Alternative Energy
Are solar, wind, and other alternatives the magic bullets that will
solve the world’s environmental and energy problems? Take a closer look,
says Ozzie Zehner in Green Illusions
. Zehner not only argues that green energy has technological,
environmental and economic limits, but also that without an appropriate
policy context, some forms of alternative energy could do more harm than
good.
The dirty secrets of clean energy
The first part of Zehner’s book—by far the best—is devoted to explaining why neither photovoltaic, nor wind, nor biomass, nor any of the other alternatives to fossil fuels will be able to deliver a future of abundant, cheap, clean energy. Chapter by chapter, he brings out the environmental and economic limitations of each technology. Among the highlights—Read more
Update, May 2020: This book review was originally posted on the now-defunct Economonitor.com. I have reposted the review in full here.
The first part of Zehner’s book—by far the best—is devoted to explaining why neither photovoltaic, nor wind, nor biomass, nor any of the other alternatives to fossil fuels will be able to deliver a future of abundant, cheap, clean energy. Chapter by chapter, he brings out the environmental and economic limitations of each technology. Among the highlights—
Friday, December 7, 2012
US Unemployment Drops to 7.7 Percent, Lowest Since January 2009; Payroll Jobs Continue Steady Rise
The U.S. unemployment rate dropped to 7.7 percent in
November, according to today’s
data release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That was down 0.2 percent
since October, and was the lowest rate reported since January 2009. Payroll
jobs increased by 146,000 in the month, continuing a moderate but steady trend.
The unemployment rate is the ratio of unemployed persons to
the civilian labor force, based on a monthly survey of households. Both the
numerator and denominator of the ratio decreased in November. The ratio fell
because the number of unemployed persons decreased by more than the number of
the employed. Both the labor force participation rate and the
employment-population ratio decreased slightly, with both figures returning to
the values reported in September. >>>Read more